Why is the GUI preferred over CLI during the upgrade process?

The preference for using the GUI over the CLI during the upgrade process can be attributed to several factors, but the reasoning aligns well with the capabilities afforded by a graphical interface.

The graphical user interface is designed to present users with a visual representation of the upgrade process, which can include real-time feedback, progress bars, and logs that enhance the overall experience. Unlike the CLI, where commands must be typed in correctly and can often lead to confusion, the GUI simplifies the process by providing clear prompts and buttons to click, reducing the margin for error.

While the connection speed over SSH in the CLI can present challenges, especially if there are network issues or high latency, the GUI tends to abstract these complexities away from the user. It provides a more intuitive flow without the need to worry about command syntax or connectivity delays. This makes it easier to initiate, track, and complete upgrades without the potential frustrations associated with a command-line interface, particularly for users who may not be as comfortable with text-based commands.

Additionally, the graphical interface can often handle multiple tasks or operations simultaneously, aligning well with the concept of multi-threading. This capability ensures that while one operation is taking place, the user can continue to interact with the interface for other necessary functions, leading to